|
Post by cowboytodd25 on Aug 2, 2005 18:48:35 GMT -5
One topic on here leads to nothing more than that topic. That's stupid. Every reply to one topic could always lead to other topics in one. If we to start a new topic for every thought, we would have 30,000 different topics a question about bulls was brought up i replied to it and added something.
I have a hard time understanding why people would get so upset when somebody goes off topic, the point of this is for discussion we are not in school and should not be treated like kids. Bulls were the topic and i added that the riders should be judged just as close, it went hand in hand. Afterall if it weren't for the riders the bulls wouldn't be getting bucked now would they!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Not Arguing or having a problem with AUTHORITY just making a point.
Hey cody, If you want everyone to get along and be happy you should be the only one posting because no one disagrees with you and that is the truth. Everything i reply to gets negative feedback but hey at least when i start a topic it is good for at least 25 responses so i guess that is a good thing right.
|
|
|
Post by WI8SecFan on Aug 2, 2005 19:23:03 GMT -5
Todd I have absolutely no problem with one topic leading to another. But there are times that the divergence is so severe that it does make sense to make it two topics. For example if we want to discuss the process for how bulls get to and remain on the PBR tour it is totally different and has totally different pros and cons then the rider system. They can not be easily discussed to their fullest within the same thread. Both have their merits as a conversation and both could get some interesting discussions so why not start two threads. People who may not be interested in the bulls may participate if they have an opinion of the riders if we create two threads making the board more active. Now on the other hand if a discussion came up and were related to the way the judges were scoring and you were comparing say the weight they gave rider performance versus the bulls performance the two are directly related and the two could easily be discussed hand in hand in the same topic.
Finally, how did you think that the comment was a disagreement with you or even directed just at you? I am sorry if you took it in that way. There were others after you that had referenced it and were asking other questions that was sending the thread in a different rider only direction. That is why the comment was made. If you look at the thread I agreed with you. Not everyone is here to disagree with you and just because they do does not mean that it is because the opinion is yours. Trust me I have disagreed with a lot of people on this board including Cody and I let them know it too. Actually I think that Cody and I have disagreed more then we have agreed.
|
|
|
Post by cowboytodd25 on Aug 2, 2005 19:26:36 GMT -5
It was directed directly at m e for the simple fact that i was the one that made the comment. We both know that i said if we get rid of the bulls we have to get rid of the riders also and then you at the end of your post said "about the riders we know that is a different topic than her " or something to that effect ok yes it was directed towards me i was the only one who made the comment.
Further more i think alot of people agree with me not that i care if they don't but i have a positive effect i believe. I know you agreed with me. i really could have stirred up some stuff all i had to do would be to throw names out. i won't do that anymore though, people feel they are related to the riders and i am attacking the family.
|
|
|
Post by WI8SecFan on Aug 2, 2005 19:41:01 GMT -5
Todd if you read Megan's post you will see that her post was going the rider direction. It was not just directed toward you it was a general comment.
|
|
|
Post by cowboytodd25 on Aug 2, 2005 19:48:59 GMT -5
It does not matter. It is over. I voiced my thoughts thats all. Megs said that she agreed with me that we had to do something with the riders also so i see where you are coming from i guess i thought sense i mentioned it first you were directing it at me no big deal no harm no foul
|
|
|
Post by megz07 on Aug 2, 2005 20:15:47 GMT -5
Todd if you read Megan's post you will see that her post was going the rider direction. It was not just directed toward you it was a general comment. ;D tehe whoops.... ADHD what can i say?? lol mr. todd...plz dont give yourself ALL the credit. I manage to confuse and construe too! ...not sayin you do...but i did start to get off topic....like WAY OFF! Ill admit to that! my bad. lol.
|
|
|
Post by CThrash13 on Aug 2, 2005 22:08:13 GMT -5
*shakes head*
If it isn't one thing, it's another.
I have 100% confidence that this board will always have some drama going on. I have been a member of many message boards, but this board has 75 members!! That is it, not very many at all. I've never seen so much drama out of such a small message board.
I understand when you have 1000 members, there will be drama. But how can 75 people not get along worth a d**n?!? It's beyond me.
|
|
|
Post by csb on Aug 2, 2005 22:34:21 GMT -5
LOL Cody. Its just the way things work. I disagree with you on most things, but we seem to get along just fine.
Maybe Rodney King needs to come in here and give us a litte speech on how to "just get along".
|
|
|
Post by cowboy4443 on Aug 3, 2005 7:28:51 GMT -5
Instead of having a rodeo king & queen, we could have a drama king and queen. Once your voted on, the only way off is to have someone more ig-nat post a nasty message. At that point , you can pass the crown.
But seriously, this is not the cowboy way. Everyone including myself needs to review thier manner book daily. Cowboys and cowgirls should be looked at with the highest regard in respect of others.
charlie
|
|